Xgau SezThese are questions submitted by readers, and answered by Robert Christgau. New ones will appear in batches every third Tuesday. To ask your own question, please use this form. June 16, 2021Lousy (or not) Stones albums, world champion Beatles albums, some musical geniuses, some upbeat albums, and whither rock & roll? Plus: the story of 1974's Consumer Guide to America's Yogurts. [Q] I really enjoy your reviews and your writing in general. I do notice that you sort of pick your favorites, though--you gave the Rolling Stones' Dirty Work an A and Steel Wheels a B+??? You cannot be serious with these positive reviews--these are two albums that even the band will tell you are terrible. I love the Rolling Stones but Dirty Work might be one of the worst-produced albums of all time. I mean it's just bad. Do you honestly pull out this album out still? As for A Bigger Bang, it's OK but nowhere near as good as the review you give. It's sort of a very good imitation of a Stones album. "Streets of Love" is just terrible second-rate Mick Jagger solo album material. You honestly think these albums I mentioned above don't top any of Queen's first six albums? I mean really? -- Adam Marr, New York City [A]
What a strange question even disregarding the fact that
I gave Steel Wheels a B
minus, not a B plus. Though I'm glad you like my work, I'm sad
that some basic principles haven't gotten through. A major one is that
in the end people like what they like, and that a simple way of
understanding the critic's job is that critics should among other
things try and explain what their opinions/responses are and where
they come from. As has
already come up in this space, I'm not a Queen fan even though,
inspired mostly by my daughter, I've warmed to their precise, campy
comic grandeur. When I find time to explore, I might listen more
intensively. But if I live to 100 I'll never find time to hear much
less immerse in their first six albums. Maybe my feelings will
shift a little, but I'll never like them that much, and at best I'll
limit myself to a best-of or two. Moreover, the Stones are inscribed a
lot deeper on my sensorium than on yours--I've been a sucker for a
fundamental groove I attribute mostly to Keith Richards and the great
Charlie Watts since "It's All Over Now" hit the airwaves in the fall
of 1964. And even though Jagger isn't my kind of guy as a human being,
their sound plus his flair sparked into life longer than most aging
rockers could manage.
My unconventional fondness for
Dirty Work remained in place last time I checked--a
tremendously underrated album especially given the pass the Stones got
on the 1983 Under Cover, its opprobrium based mostly on the
overblown reaction to the echoey way producer Steve Lillywhite did
drums, which is neither here nor there as far as I'm
concerned. Replaying A Bigger Bang for the first time since
2006, my A minus seems right--the opening "Rough Justice" is a
strikingly ironic/acerbic expression of both Jagger's musical gift and
his romantic limitations and the songwriting strong is throughout,
though "Streets of Love" is no high point. In addition to the CG
review,
wrote longer about A
Bigger Bang for Blender in 2005 and then
reviewed a 2006 show of theirs for
the same mag. I stand by everything I wrote. Check it
out--especially the show review.
[Q] In your recent Too Much Joy review you quip that they aren't Randy Newman meets the Clash cause those acts are genius while Too Much Joy just have high IQs. I've noticed that genius seems to be a word that you are hesitant to use to describe musicians. It got me thinking, how do you define genius when it comes to musical artists? Is it based on their sonic innovation, language, what you think they'd get in an IQ test, or something else? Also, who are the definite geniuses in music, and do any/all of the following qualify: Prince, John Lennon, Paul McCartney, Kanye West, David Bowie, M.I.A., El DeBarge, Eminem, Lil Wayne, Stevie Wonder, Taylor Swift, James Brown, Billie Eilish, Captain Beefheart, Frank Ocean, and Brian Wilson. -- Anonymous, Europe [A]
First of all, I use the word "genius" plenty--too much, probably;
Google says it gets 1130 hits on my site where "talent" comes in at
1050 and "smart" at 913. Second, musical genius doesn't have much to
do with IQ, certainly not, for instance, the 175 that talented
non-genius Bob Mould claims in his memoir, though 120-125 would
probably be a good idea just to utilize and kick-start the musical
genius properly. Third, most of the musical geniuses I can think of
are Black: on your list James Brown above all with Prince second,
maybe Wonder, not DeBarge or Ocean, but how come you left out Ray
Charles and Aretha Franklin? (And Louis Armstrong! Duke Ellington even
though he's never been a favorite of mine! Thelonious Monk! Miles
Davis!) The one obvious white genius who comes to mind is easy and
isn't on your list: Bob Dylan. Ditto for Joni Mitchell whatever her
vanities, Lennon probably, Eminem in his fucked up way conceivably,
and I definitely wouldn't rule out Swift. The others less, with
understandable candidate Beefheart exemplifying near-genius's
limitations. Billie Eilish PLUS HER BROTHER, THAT'S DEFINITELY A
PARTNERSHIP, might qualify in 10 years and might not. When I wrote my
Billboard obit of George Jones I pulled out the G-word, which didn't
seem preposterous, especially for someone on a death deadline. As for
Randy Newman and the Clash, both come close enough to justify a good
joke, Newman in particular given his soundtrack sideline. And now I
declare an end to this party game.
[Q] Did the Beatles ever make an A plus album? -- Faizal Ali, Minneapolis [A]
Ordinarily I skip A plus questions but this one I couldn't resist. How
could I not nominate the two
I put on my Rolling Stone
list: Sgt. Pepper and The Beatles' Second Album, the
latter of which most Beatles scholars don't believe counts if they
even acknowledge it exists? But because so much of my early Beatles
listening was their U.S. albums, I'm not qualified to distinguish
among the "official" UK versions that preceded
Sgt. Pepper. Moreover, while I feel and understand the artistic
skill and historical momentousness of prime candidate Rubber
Soul, in fact I only cream for three of its songs: "Norwegian
Wood," "Girl," and "In My Life." A plusses have to do more than that
for me.
[Q] hello mr. christgau, i am a big fan of your writing and music ratings. i often agree with your reviews, except for a few rap records that i disagree with haha. anyway, i would like to know what "happy/upbeat" records are some of your favorites? i am talking records in the likes of: rilo kiley's under the blacklight; van morrison's moondance; donald fagen's the nightfly and robyn's body talk. these are some of my favorite records to listen to and i would like to know more albums like them that i should listen to. -- gavin highly, minneapolis [A]
These things are so personal. I mean, I love The Nightfly and
Carola adores it. But Donald Fagen "happy/upbeat"? That pathological
ironist? How??? Still, I thought it might be fun to find something
suitable. Two records I go to for that sort of thing are
Franco & Rochereau's Omona
Wapi and
Manu Chao's Proxima Estacion
Esperanza, but both may be too world-musicky for your
tastes. Either '70s New York Dolls album?
KaitO's Band Red, a
recent if admittedly esoteric rediscovery around here?
The New Pornographers' Whiteout
Conditions?
Toots and the Maytals' Funky
Kingston, which another reader just excoriated me so
passionately for giving it an A minus rather than a full A that I
replayed it and found it was still an A minus for me. Hey wait, I've
got just the thing: The Beatles' Second
Album. Guaran-fucking-teed.
[Q] I have been an avid reader of robertchristgau.com since I was in high school (now about 10 years ago). During that critical time in my life, my taste has evolved a great deal, and your writing has proved a major influence on that evolution, helping me become attuned to and fall in love with (broadly speaking) African music, rock-n-roll, and classic soul. Having fallen in love with those (meta)genres, however, I can't help but feel a bit melancholy at the increasing marginality of rock-n-roll and classic soul songforms and archetypes in the popular consciousness (music from the African continent being marginal in the US by definition). Is it possible we might have a revival of interest in these ways of doing music? Do you think the great music of the '50s and '60s can translate to a new audience raised on the internet? Will bands ever be a "thing" again? Am I being overly pessimistic? PS: Special thanks for introducing me to Youssou N'Dour & Étoile de Dakar with your A+. -- Grace Brown, Montreal [A]
What can I say? Popular music evolves just like any art form--Louis
Armstrong and His Hot Seven were revolutionary in the late '20s and
still sound amazing today, but while it's possible to imagine some
historically inclined imitator reviving that sound to an extent,
that's a long shot technically and an impossibility culturally--just
wouldn't strike the kind of same spark, in the audience or among the
musicians themselves (plus, of course, no Satchmo). It's
distressed me for many years that the
rock and roll of the '50s is an unmapped antiquity for most young
listeners--to me the great Chuck Berry and Coasters and Buddy
Holly records plus many doowop one-shots (let's hear it for, hmm, how
about Johnnie and Joe's "Over the Mountain, Across the Sea") are
thrilling on the face of it, but to listeners your age (assuming for
the moment that your autobiographical profile is factual) that music
has been aesthetically inaccessible for decades. Almost the same goes
for soul stylings, although a few aging holdouts as well as some young
multiformalists like (Brown University graduate)
Jamila Woods continue
to work in that general area. But with bands it's different. There are
still plenty of bands, some even g-g-b-d or g-k-b-d, exploring that
option, and still venues for them too.
[Q] I was wondering when this summer tasting of yogourts from around America happened. -- Rishi Patel, London, Ontario [A]
Forgive me for rendering it yogurt from here on--just learned that
your Canadian spelling came to be because it's bilingual, correct in
French as well as English as Canadian law requires. Anyway, I no
longer remember the sequence, but there was an editor named John
Lombardi at a short-lived Playboy-backed girlie mag dubbed
Oui, a purportedly "hipper" variant as I recall, who was taken
with the letter-grading thing. (He also assigned me an Al Green
profile that ended up in Boston's Real Paper which changed my
view of rock history after I plumbed the Joel Whitburn books and
learned that many Black artists--not Green, he was too young--had been
scoring minor hit singles in the lower reaches of the Billboard
chart in the early '60s, when radio heads like myself were unaware
they existed.) I suggested that the much more food-savvy Carola
Dibbell collaborate with me on consumer guides, let's lower-case the
term, to beer, which occasioned many naps as well as a search for
flatulence medications, and coffee, which once had me roaring down
West 8th Street in my Toyota at 45 miles an hour in pursuit of some
jerk who'd cut me off.
The yogurt edition, which I'm
amazed got published (with a comically salacious illo of course) we
researched when we undertook a four-month road trip across the U.S. in
1973 in that Toyota--stored our dairy purchases in an ice chest in the
back. We took a lot of notes and came up with language on the run when
we could. Most of the writing on all the food pieces was Carola's,
who's terrific at physical description, and looking back I love how
funny this piece is. "One of the worst yogurts in America. Smells like
fresh chemicals, and the blueberry looks like extract of used
typewriter ribbon. Cheap and gummy." "The best supermarket
yogurt. Although most of the flavors were not special, you could spill
the tart, cheesecakey orange into a sherbert glass and call it
dessert." "They say the best yogurt is the yogurt you make yourself,
but that's not as easy as it sounds. In Laramie, however, there are no
reasonable alternatives. George Szanto's first batch melted in our
mouths, something like snow. The second had some rough residue and was
too sour. But it was fresh, and it sure beat Meadow Gold Viva." "One
of the worst. The aftertaste penetrated its most lurid flavors, and
the boysenberry was gray." Or here's the long-running Colombo, now a
proven quality brand that earned its A as surely as Randy Newman: "The
blueberry, with its dusky blue color, generous strewings of berries,
and creamy consistency is the best in America, as is the all-natural
honey vanilla. When they make it right, even the wheat germ and honey
is better than you can mix yourself."
|
|