Xgau SezThese are questions submitted by readers, and answered by Robert Christgau. New ones will appear in batches every third Tuesday. To ask your own question, please use this form. July 09, 2019[Q] I discovered Nick Hornby's High Fidelity as a teenager, around the same time that I started reading your reviews. Rob Fleming's inclusion of "Tired of Being Alone" in his all-time Top Five list was my introduction to Al Green, and I recall going straight to your Consumer Guide to check if Green was the real deal. That said, what do you think of 1) the novel, 2) the movie adaptation, and 3) the various top-five lists featured in each? -- Nigel Jaffe, Jersey City [A]
Here's a tip, kidz. You're interested in what I think about something,
stick it into the Google search utility at my site, as I did to locate
the review I long ago published
of High Fidelity. I think the novel is entertaining but limited,
the movie better, and have no interest in either's top-five lists,
though my review added one you can now go find. Hornby was and
presumably remains a "rock" moldy fig whose ears closed up in his
thirties as so many do. He was briefly a terrible rock critic in
The New Yorker, a gig he lost, if memory serves, when he wrote
a column bragging that he had not heard a single album in the top 10
of the week he was writing.
[Q] You reviewed a couple of Grateful Dead CDs recently (Cornell '77 and Crimson White & Indigo) and you've written that Jimi Hendrix and Neil Young and others redefine their music in concert, so I'd like to know if you're always monitoring the endless stream of archival concert releases and crate digs by the Dead, Hendrix, Neil Young, etc. or do you only check out ones that have good word of mouth? I can attest that both of Hendrix's recent releases (Freedom: Atlanta Pop Festival from 2015 and Machine Gun from 2016) earn their acclaim. Neil Young's Roxy Tonight's the Night Live (2018) and his new Tuscaloosa both sound pretty great too. And lately Bruce Springsteen has made many of his best concerts available for sale at nugs.net, including the classic Roxy, July 7, 1978. And have you heard David Bowie's Welcome to the Blackout (Live in London) which is absolutely superb? And what about Sonic Youth's Battery Park NYC July 4, 2008? -- Bill Sussman, Astoria, New York [A]
The fact that some artists redefine their music in concert doesn't
mean you can hear that miracle on their live albums. Imprecise audio,
loose arrangements, protracted solos best propped up with visuals and
ambient pheromones all slacken their impact. I played Hendrix's
Atlanta CD just once and find most of Young's many live albums de trop
even though I love the ancient
Time Fades Away and like
Live Rust; the two Deads
you mention got *** and *, and the only one I'm likely to
replay is the first side of CW&I because the sequence indicated in the
recommended tracks is truly extraordinary; love the
Broadway
solo Springsteen, which is new conceptually (basically a musical
version of his autobiography) but have never been compelled by his
live E Street stuff. Etc. My favorite live album of all time is Monk's
Misterioso--jazzmen in general are more accomplished and
unpredictable soloists than rock musicians plus less dependent on
audience vibes. Best live album of this century off the top of my head:
Leonard Cohen's de facto best-of
Live in London. PS: The
Sonic Youth I've been playing with pleasure for weeks. I believe the '00s
were their live peak. Kim is incendiary.
[Q] Why do you allow yourself to keep getting "retired"? Go into business for yourself! Set up a subscription service. Subscribers get a monthly e-mail blast of reviews for a small yearly pay-paled subscription fee. You'd only need a few thousand subscribers to make it financially viable. What's the problem with that? -- Ryan Gilliver, Lincoln, England [A]
Whaddaya mean, "allow" myself? It's as if everybody's-a-freelancer is
a nouveau-avant-garde up-to-the-century ideal. To me this seems like
dog-eat-dog capitalism in an era when ye olde www has drastically
reduced the cash value of both recorded music and the written
word. I've been a journalist all my life, and never happier or more at
home than when I was part of a great newspaper called The Village
Voice. And when the Voice canned me I was proud to be part of larger
collectivities at both MSN and Noisey (Medium, I'd say, functioned
differently). But all that said, and you bet I could go on, I am
considering self-publishing at one of several sites designed to
facilitate such ventures. I'll start no earlier than September, will
get out fast if I'm not making enough money at it, and am not yet sure
I want to do it at all. It so happens my first Voice Consumer Guide
ran July 1969, which means Noisey pulled the plug--which happened, of
course, because maintaining profitable publications on the web is a
difficult trick--precisely 50 years after I started. There's a poetry
in that. And although I still find myself writing capsule album
reviews of stuff I was getting ready to do when I was told the column
was ending just 10 days ago as I write, I need to find out what life
is like without that particular obligation. Stay tuned.
June 18, 2019[Q] Here is a list of my top nine favorite African artists:
With whom shall I complete my top ten? -- Adam S. Fenton, Temecula, California [A] Whoa, Nellie. You're missing someone I didn't notice at first because
I assumed he was
there--Luambo Franco, next to if
not along with N'Dour the very greatest, start with the two superb
Sterns Africa two-CD Francophonic comps and the Rochereau collab
Omona Wapi. Moreover, I'd count
N'Dour and Étoile de Dakar as one artist--that band was his invention,
period--leaving room for another woman.
Oumou Sangare or possibly
Mariem Hassan would be my picks.
[Q] Do you like "Old Town Road"? -- Alexander Robertson, Wilton, Connecticut [A] I like "Old Town Road" in the Billy Ray Cyrus remix. But I don't love
it. As a song I think it tops Childish Gambino's "This Is America" but
not Cardi B's "Bodak Yellow," two previous must-hear
this-is-a-phenomenon singles I got on late because I'm so
album-oriented in this phase of my life, but found none of the three
as culturally or aesthetically compelling as I was supposed to. This
may be because I'm 77 and may be because most current "memes," if
that's what these are, are less intrinsically compelling than
must-hears should be. More than, let us say, "Beat It" or "Hound Dog"
(but maybe not the overrated "Heartbreak Hotel"), they are pure
functions of an information system less universal than such
information systems are credited with being. This is why so many
"memes" would once just have been called "hypes." On the other hand,
taking "Old Town Road" off the country chart strikes me as racist pure
and simple, because country radio remains racist regardless of the
Darius Ruckers and Kane Browns it makes room for. And of course, it's
also sexist in an era when so many of the edgiest country singers are
women: Miranda Lambert, Angaleena Presley, Becky Warren, Margo Price,
Ashley Monroe, Mary Gauthier, even Kacey Musgraves, can I mention Lori
McKenna, and I know I'm forgetting people.
[Q] Do you still stand by C- for Master of Reality and if so why? -- William Hjelte, Brooklyn [A] Why wouldn't I, and why doesn't
the review I wrote--I believe in
1980, when I was filling out
the first Consumer Guide collection, rather
than 1971--suffice to explain? Was Sabbath an Important Band that
belongs in the Rock Hall? Of course. Did I think the Osbournes'
reality show was kinda funny? Indeed I did. But people like what they
like, and why you'd expect someone with my sensibility to change his
mind about that particular band I can't begin to know. It so happens
that when I was doing my radio show for the Voice in 2001 my producer
was a Sabbath fan. I liked him a lot, so when he asked me to give them
another shot and provided a CD to make it easier, I did, for two-three
plays. No go. End of story. Life is short and great music an all but
infinite expanse.
[Q] I notice you don't review jazz records much lately, though you used to, notably Ornette Coleman. I know you chewed out Richard Meltzer back in the day for trying to review jazz without having the chops--did you even make him apologize to Gary Giddins?--but I would be curious to hear your views on Kamasi Washington's recent The Epic, especially because image wise it seems aimed at a wider/pop/rock audience. Although he puts a large orchestra plus a female choir into the kitchen sink, I hear rather little emotional substance. -- Simon Hearn, Vancouver [A] First of all, I've never reviewed jazz much. Instead I followed jazz
artists with rock or "rock"
connections--Miles Davis's
avant-electro-'70s,
Ornette Coleman with his
harmolodics (both of which claimed and for the most part earned "funk"),
James Blood Ulmer and his ilk,
the prolific and ever-changing
David Murray,
Nils Petter Molvaer and a few other
trumpeters extending Miles's '70s into dub and techno--plus a few classic
favorites, notably
Monk and
Sonny Rollins, who I had language
and experience to explain to rock-oriented readers who'd followed me that
far. Plus some overrated '70s "fusion" when that was a thing. These days,
the old masters I came up with are gone, and I find I don't have the
interest to explore new guys: Joshua Redman in particular clearly has
something going for him, but also pretty clearly limitations I don't
have the listening experience or critical chops to unravel. The recent
Sons of Kemet and
Harriet
Tubman albums were gratifying exceptions. I hope there are more, but
I have no intention of immersing in deep research or going off half-cocked
to find them. As for Kamasi Washington and the rest of that LA posse, I
think it's soft and all too feel-good. But that's a hunch only, one
I'm unlikely to expand on in a format that has no use for Duds. (P.S.:
As for Meltzer, there was never any way to "make" him do anything,
which is to his credit.)
[Q] You've spoken before about how Johnny Griffin's tenor sax solo on Monk's Misterioso represents your favourite piece of recorded music. Are there any other segments of music that give it a run for its money? -- Adam, London [A] The one parallel to that "In Walked Bud" solo I can think of I've
written about before: the first, non-hit side of
Bill Doggett's 1956 "Honky Tonk,"
its second side the biggest rock instrumental of the '50s, which I
listened to for an hour straight on the living-room rug at 14 and
came out a different person--my conversion to the blues template,
which I replay occasionally to this day, although I listen to both
sides consecutively now. That was life-changing. So it makes sense
in a way that the more recent alternatives that come to mind are
both death-related: Willie Nelson's "September Song," which my
bedridden mother-in-law listened to over and over in the last months
of her life (although often we played more of
Stardust than that), and the
Beach Boys' "Darlin'," which
brought my wife and me to tears in the early days of her stem cell
transplant sequestration last September. Those are obviously not
strictly musical judgments, wonderful though the music has to be to
make such an impression. Nevertheless, when I replay them now, and
I do once in a while, the impact recalled remains.
[Q] You periodically reference requiring a certain mood/circumstance to completely appreciate an album--"Granted, its uses are limited--best for late nights alone," for Leonard Cohen's Songs of Love and Hate, "I'd have to be in a very special angry mood to play it," for an Idles album. It strikes me as the critic in conversation with the listener, the critic toward the "objective" (I know) end of the spectrum, the listener adding a necessary dose of subjectivity. I'm curious about how an album's "usefulness"--its ability to match or mold a mood--figures into your evaluations. Does a narrow range of commensurate moods make for a lower grade? -- Dustin Lowman, New York City [A] What I really listen for is the kind of thrill that at its most
intense feels like love. But on the earthly plane the fact is that I
care much more about use value--a term
Google reveals comes up dozens of times in my reviews over the
years--than "objective" aesthetics, especially since a chief virtue
of the latter is that they boost the former: the better executed or
made an album, the more likely its use value is to endure. Indeed,
it's rare for me to play an album without being something like "in
the mood" for it, which is use value enough. And this goes way back.
I've published precisely one poem in my life unless
my rewrite of "Short People"
counts, at Dartmouth when I was 19. It begins: "I will make poems/for
my own uses/musical as hurdy-gurdies/and sad as the old man whimpers."
Still sounds like me, I'd say.
May 28, 2019[Q] Do you consider Pitchfork's 8.7 review of Lou Reed's Metal Machine Music trolling? Your own C+ I can sort of get, but come on . . . 8.7? Ok, to be fair I have only heard the "A 1" track myself, but this is a mind game, right? I would have more fun with the drumbeats on the live "Waiting for My Man" than listen again. Next up we have 9.2 for 1973's Dylan because it's actually a masterpiece. Right? -- Ian Sommers, Manchester, England [A] I don't know if I'd call it trolling, but in general I think this
particular P4K feature/gimmick is more about repositioning the mag and
recalibrating the canon than anything systematic or serious. Since
this particular extreme example was written by Mark Richardson, who
was the editor at the time, it's fair to assume it was done with some
sort of editorial strategy behind it, but that's not to suggest that I
think he did it solely to shock and be contrarian--he's always been a
more judicious critic than that. Instead I'd surmise that the prog
side of him had always believed (or, less propitiously, recently
decided) that this provocative album had gotten a raw deal and thought
it would be nice positioning for Pitchfork to play around with its own
hard-earned stature as the established critical voice of the
thoughtful young music fan by saying so in print. If you think that's
trolling, a term I've never been comfortable with unless it involved
anonymous, fictional personas, then you have a right, I guess. But my
assumption is that the ideas expressed in that review are truly
Richardson's. Not that they'd ever move me to relisten just to make
sure. My 1977 review was based on multiple plays I have no desire to
repeat. And I would also add that Metal Machine Music is a far
cry from
Dylan. It has a conceptual
rationale and is original in that respect, which Dylan does not.
[Q] Hello! I wonder if there are any musicians of the rock age that you love but your wife can't stand, or vice versa? -- Robin Ingman, Upplands, Väsby, Sweden [A] Basically, the answer is no, which is kind of miracle, isn't it? As I
recall, she didn't like how
Idles sounded, but first
five times through neither did I, and though I came to admire that
record I'd have to be in a very special angry mood to play it. In
general, however, as we've gotten older I've been less inclined to
play abrasive new music for her, though she has no trouble with the
old stuff: Clash, Pavement, etc., and the fact is that I don't hear
much abrasive new music that I like myself--never really liked the Fat
White Family, say, though I intend to try again soon. Ditto for the
more aggressive strands of hip-hop, although she actually worries that
she doesn't hear enough recent stuff in that vein. And for sure I
often play old favorites for her--just recently Steely Dan, who we
listened to a lot when we were first together, and
Bobbie Cryner, whose debut
sounded so strong in the car this past Saturday. As I wrote in my
memoir, Carola is as aesthetically responsive as anyone I've ever
known, and that's without being any kind of sop or sponge. For a
critic, she's such a gift, not a shit detector but a divining
rod--when she notices something new that she likes I'm usually a lot
further on my way to an A or at least a high Honorable Mention.
[Q] If you were a TED Talk, you'd be Chuck Klosterman. Any opinion on the guy? -- Rene Ortega, Fallbrook, California [A] If I'm supposed to understand what the TED talk reference means,
sorry, I don't. Does Klosterman do TED talks? For that matter, do you
watch them? Wha? Anyway, Klosterman's obviously a very bright guy who
I bet isn't as facile as he makes it seem. I like Fargo Rock
City but have never worked up any interest in his other books or
understood why he was declared an "ethicist" (wasn't that it?) by the
NYT. That's in part because I've never credited what moral
judgments of his I've encountered. He always seemed clever and
contrarian for their own sake, the kind of guy who'd generate a
"theory" he'd forget six months down the road. I will add, however,
that he can be very funny. I once did a reading with him for some
function I've long forgotten and he blew me off the stage--I enjoyed
what he read more than what I wrote myself.
[Q] Good day, Robert. Please share your opinion of John and Yoko's "Woman Is the Nigger of the World." -- Wayne Timmins, Ontario, Canada [A] The whole Some Time in New York City album sounds better to me now
than it used to, and "Woman Is
the Nigger of the World" was always the best song on it. Problem is,
of course, that even in 1973 white people appropriating the word
"nigger" was not just problematic but beyond the pale. And it still
is. But as protest music goes, the detail and analysis of the rest of
the lyric remain of unusual intelligence and complexity. Good tune,
too.
[Q] Are you pussy-whipped? Do you review straight white males with guitars anymore or are they beholden to the patriarchy? You're worse than NPR. -- Drew Hirsch, Sweetbrier, California [A] I am a white male heterosexual who has identified publicly as a
feminist since 1970. Since then I have written thousands of positive
reviews of bands consisting entirely of straight white guys with
guitars. So far in 2018 I've added albums by Idles, Pedro the
Lion, Todd Snider (solo, true), Robert Forster, Jason Ringenberg, and,
er, Bruce Springsteen (also solo, hmm), not one of whom is stupid
enough to think "pussy-whipped" a striking or witty term. Facts:
African-Americans have always been the prime creative motor of
American music, I've had an active interest in African music since it
began to become more available in the mid-'80s, and most of today's
interesting younger guitar bands are led by women, freed up by the
confidence that they won't attract ginks like you to their shows.
[Q] Have you decided what album you will listen to on your deathbed? -- Rob, Pittsburgh May 07, 2019[Q] Hey there. Mongo hasn't written in a while been busy making pigs happy this spring, they only settle down with Fox news on in the barn. Go figure. Anyway, I want to say I just can't wait to read your forthcoming collection Book Reports. (Thank you btw for the discount code too.) Mongo wonder, do you have a favorite book that you've read more than once in your life that can generate laughter from you. Mongo love Confederacy of Dunces for this very reason. -- Mongo, A Warm Muddy Midwestern Pig Farm [A] Of novels I've read twice--I keep a record of sorts, believe it or
not--the ones that make me laugh are
Ishmael Reed's Mumbo Jumbo
and
Roddy Doyle's The Commitments.
But that's not why I look them over again. I do that because they loom
large in my life. So after reading your note I got on a stepladder and
pulled down George Ade's Fable in Slang and More Fables in
Slang, which I have in one volume that cost me a buck in 1962 or so.
That made me laugh yet again. And when I reread
Dave Hickey's Air Guitar,
which I do often, in bits and pieces, I always laugh. A hilarious as
well as a brilliant critic. His slept-on 2017 Perfect Wave is
recommended.
[Q] The subtitle for Book Reports I can only suppose is an allusion to some 18th- or 19th-century bildungsroman--what's the story? And in light of the recent challenge to a similarly high-profile university press, any balming stories of editorial support at Duke, re the subtitle or otherwise? -- L.R., Washington DC [A] I thought the subtitle was cute, precise, and bracingly unorthodox,
end of story--certainly not a literary reference, in case that
question wasn't an obscure joke. As for university presses, the
Stanford story you link to is utterly unsurprising in a political
environment where profit maximization at all costs is assumed almost
everywhere to increasingly disastrous effect--including the book
industry, natch, where "midlist" authors like me can no longer get
decent advances. This is not to imply that I've ever made much money
off any of my books. I publish books because I love books and read as
many as I can--somewhere in the Jonathan Lethem piece in Book
Reports the permanently book-mad Lethem puts this motivation
better than I ever could. And into the midlist vacuum have stepped
various university presses. Robert Gipe, who's published two terrific
novels set in Kentucky coal country that I like a lot, did it with
Ohio University. The Why TK Matters series to which my friends
Donna Gaines and
Tom Smucker have contributed
40,000-worders on the Ramones and the Beach Boys was dropped by a
disintegrating University of New England Press and picked up by
University of Texas. And my Duke editor Ken Wissoker published
collections by Chuck Eddy (two) and Greg Tate before he did my two.
As I'm telling audiences on my far-flung promotional tour, which will
bring me to all the way to
Word Books in Greenpoint May 23, Ken and I made literary history.
Never before, to my knowledge, have two journalism collections by the
same author appeared within the same six-month span, or indeed in
successive years.
[Q] Have you ever had a show on a college or community radio station? If not, is it something you ever thought about doing? -- Nick [A] I did do an hour-long show briefly in 2001 when some genius at the
Voice thought maybe we could right the ship by getting into internet
radio. To the paper's dismay, I insisted on being paid for it, only
$100 as I recall but I earned it and then some. Doing radio right is
work--fun, interesting, sometimes even exciting work, but work. (Doing
playlists at Rhapsody was work too, and that I did for free as part of
my licensing deal there, 2007-2009 if I recall. Much less fun, too.)
Eighteen years later, I'd probably accept a job offer were one offered
but wouldn't consider doing it for nothing. I'm a writer and not
getting any younger or more energetic. I love writing. And writing is
HARD work.
[Q] What percentage of your listening is not new releases? Oh often, for instance, do you listen to your A-graded albums from earlier than, say, 2018? -- Howard Litwak, Seattle [A] Not enough. Probably not even five percent. More when we go out of
town, from the iPod 160 whose battery I just had replaced. Looking
over my to-shelve nook, where there are currently 36 CDs, I see the
Beach Boys' Smiley Smile/Wild Honey, Best of the
Chantels, the Coathangers' Nosebleed Weekend, The Very
Best of the 5 Royales, the Go-Betweens' Oceans Apart, Skip
James' Blues From the Delta, the Mekons' Ancient and
Modern, Mast's Thelonious, Nicki Minaj's Pink
Friday, Noname's Room 25, The Very Best of Bud
Powell, Homeboy Sandman's Kindness for Weakness, Billie Joe
Shaver's Long in the Tooth, Sleater-Kinney's One Love,
Sneaks' Gymnastics, David Toop's Sugar and Poison comp,
Big Mama Thornton's Hound Dog: The Peacock Recordings, and
Tierra Whack's Whack World. But several of these are 2018s, a
bunch more put on (enjoyably) to contextualize stuff I may review. On
the other hand, I also listen from my iTunes for convenience sake, and
that's almost all stuff I've got in my shelves.
[Q] A lot of promising artists petered out quick or seem to have given up too soon--life, and its thirst for income or companionship, I suspect, came calling--I'd cite as examples Elliott Murphy (petered real quick); Elizabeth Elmore (legal eagle); Leah Archibald (family, causes, home, maybe?); a couple years ago I would've added Boots Riley but boy was that premature and plain wrong. Anybody you wish would have kept it up, kept at it, or would come back to favor us with his or her art? -- David Poindexter [A] This is not exactly a mystery in a world where inspiration waxes and
wanes in every art form. And were you aware of what a strange list
you'd concocted?
Murphy
made one fine album almost 40 years ago and parlayed that into a
well-supported career as he blew through the record-company advances
that ensued throughout the '70s and then faded from view because he
just couldn't duplicate Aquashow ever again. Elmore was a
supersmart indie-rocker
who never had even an
indie-scale commercial breakthrough.
Archibald was a working
mom with a music hobby that generated several fine early-'00s albums
too straightforwardly rockish for the indie circuit that I don't
recall any critic but me noticing. (Google suggests that her band
name, Wide Right, has since been adopted by several other bands, at
least one from Buffalo like Archibald.) And Boots Riley is a long and
widely renowned alt-Marxist rapper whose career leading
the Coup dates back to the early
'90s so what he's doing on this list I have no idea. There's no mystery
here. In every field of artistic endeavor there are flashes in the pan,
people whose ideas are exciting for a while and then tucker out or start
repeating themselves at a lesser order of inspiration, people with more
rewarding things to do like Elmore (and I don't just mean economically
rewarding, although sticking with the indie circuit when you have other
personally stimulating skills makes sense to me, which doesn't stop me
from I hoping she comes up with a surprise album some year). Creativity
tends to arc, and in pop music two different patterns are common--the
skyrocket that burns out fast and the craftperson who gradually gets
better (but may well peter out after that). In three of the four cases
you've named--Riley was always plainly a dynamo, though he's also so
political I can imagine him going into politics fulltime as
well--three different kinds of natural creative cycles were clearly at
play. Nothing strange about it at all.
|
|