Xgau SezThese are questions submitted by readers, and answered by Robert Christgau. New ones will appear in batches every third Tuesday. To ask your own question, please use this form. January 29, 2019[Q] Since early on in your writing, you've made explicit distinctions between "Major" and "Minor" artists. Can you elaborate on what, for you, makes an artist fall into either category? Is there a third category of "Non-Artist" or something similar? And can someone move between them, falling or rising? I think of PJ Harvey, who you deemed major back in the '90s, but since Stories From the City, Stories From the Sea doesn't seem to have done work that's impressed you very much. -- Patrick Brown, Denver [A] Major and minor aren't mathematically precise terms (and also not
terms I'd set apart by capitalizing). Nor do I use them in any
consciously systematic way, though they're the kind of trope a critic
can slip into unawares. Certainly many artists who arrive as major
lose their mojo--run out of conviction, find themselves incapable of
freshening up ideas and virtues that once took us by storm. But since
you mentioned Harvey, I looked back at
those reviews and saw that with
her I'd imbued the term with more meaning than is generally advisable
but in her case makes sense. Harvey has put out two records I gave a
full positive review since 2000's superb Stories From the
City. But as regards one of them I also say she isn't major
anymore, because she's lost so much emotional generosity. To put it
another way, as of 2011's pretty good if overpraised Let England
Shake she's on her way to becoming a crank. And as of 2016's
Hope Six Demolition Project--which because she's such a talent
still merits a *--she's rendering moral judgments there's no internal
evidence she has any right to. I hope she recovers.
[Q] I noticed No Age's Snares Like a Haircut was ranked outside your top 20 even though you initially gave it an A. Assuming, based on the ranking, it's no longer an A record, what changed your mind? -- Stephen Roberts, Newfoundland [A] Let's not get anal here, guys, and I do mean guys--in my experience,
women just don't peruse lists in this kind of detail. Finalizing the
Dean's List is a job--it's anything but tossed off, maintained
throughout the year and then substantially revised on the basis of
close to 100 percent relistening in December. But although my grades
are remarkably stable--most critics' opinions fluctuate more--that
doesn't mean they're set in stone: quite often A's dip to A minus and
vice versa and sometimes A minuses fall off the Dean's List
altogether. As it happens,
the No Age album was one I bought
early, found kind of dead and neglected, was surprised when it rose
into high A minus territory as I prepared the relevant Expert Witness,
decided at the last minute had to be a full A despite my early
misgivings, put aside again, but in December found resisted enough to
re-entry that I concluded was only a high A minus after all. In the
future, as I relisten some more, my Dean's List responses and
judgments will shift some more--last time I played the Hinds I
thought it was probably too high on the list.
[Q] How often does it happen that you want to review an album but keep changing your mind about what grade to give it so you never publish a review? Is indecisiveness or changing your mind about whether/how much you like an album a frequent occurrence for you? -- Jinkinson Smith, Atlanta [A] The basic answer to this question is never, but in part that's because
the "want" in "want to review an album" is a self-fulfilling
concept. Basically, the only albums I "want to review" are albums I
like a lot. It's circular. It is true, however, that when an artist
I've praised in the last makes an album I feel is weak (Robyn, say),
I'll try harder to see where it stands on the */**/*** scale, if
indeed it does, and once in a great while I'll begin to hear more
compelling virtues in it as I do. Sometimes, too, I'll give up on a
well-reviewed record only to return to it again later when the
critical consensus gathers mass, especially if the album would meld
well with something else I'm writing about. That happened not long ago
with Soccer Mommy, which I thought would make a good conceptual fit
with the Mitski I'd put off because I thought that despite its
evident value (A-? B+? ***? wasn't sure) conceptualizing Be the
Cowboy was going to be a challenge. In the end, the Soccer Mommy
album I'd put aside after multiple plays in the spring turned out to
sound about as good--better, actually--in a complementary way I thought
made for
an EW that hung together especially well as a whole. I don't require
that of myself, but it's nice when it happens.
[Q] I remember Robyn's previous work has won your very optimistic opinions, but her new album Honey didn't appear in your Dean's List of 2019. Have you listened to it? I'd love to hear your thoughts. -- Yang, China [A] I love Robyn, as the essay entitled
"Dancing on Her Own" in
Is It Still Good to Ya? explains at length. But Honey's
huzzahs mystify me. The Robyn of 2010 was some kind of miraculous
songbird, while the songwriting on the mildly charming Honey doesn't
approach what she seemed to roll out so effortlessly on three
successive albums eight years ago. There'll be an Honorable Mention
sooner or later. But meanwhile let me provide you with a tracklist
that made one great album of the three, which I left off the book
version for formatting reasons. I called it Robyrt's
Robyn. 1. Don't Fucking Tell Me What to Do; 2. None of Dem;
3. Dancehall Queen; 4. Dancing on My Own [Radio Version]; 5. Get
Myself Together; 6. Hang With Me; 7. Call Your Girlfriend; 8. Stars
4-Ever; 9. Indestructible; 10. Cry When You Get Older; 11. Include Me
Out; 12. Fembot; 13. U Should Know Better; 14. Criminal Intent; 15. We
Dance to the Beat; 16. Jag Vet En Dejlig Rosa.
[Q] Because of a lengthy work commute, these days I do most of my listening within the cramped environment of a Toyota Prius C. After sixty years of exposure to loud music both live and recorded I'm starting to notice a little high-end hearing loss, and as someone who listens to even more music than I, I was wondering if you have similar issues, and what, if any, precautions you take to protect your hearing. -- Jeff Callahan, Flat Rock, North Carolina [A] I haven't had a serious hearing test in 20 or 25 years and should
schedule one when I'm done with my arthritic knee and my aging
prostate and the elbow I fucked up when I was 10. But last time I did
have one, expecting the worst because I was still going to a lot of
live music, the audiologist told me my ears were exceptionally
sharp. I concluded later that this was partly because I did so much
close listening--deciphering lyrics, distinguishing between
instruments--that my score on a test that worked by requiring me to
register shifts in volume and pitch reflected learned skills as well
as physical aptitude. That said, I have none of the usual old-man
hearing symptoms--playing the TV loud, not registering my wife's
questions, etc. And the fact is that most of the live music I attend
isn't especially loud and never was--if it was, I usually stuffed
tissue paper in my ears. Similarly, I almost never play music loud at
home and never block out ambient sound when I use earphones (never
buds). Thinking about it as I write, I can detect a very slight
ambient ringing in my ears. Testing them would be a good idea. But
they've held up pretty well. I can think of two music critics in my
cohort who need hearing aids and never want to join them.
[Q] Hey Robert! I play in Deer Tick and just wanted to thank you for all of the thoughtful reviews. We are fans of your words. -- Ian O'Neill, Providence [A] Just for the record, as someone who never imagines musicians should be
his friends--it happens occasionally and friends are too precious to
turn down out of an excess of caution, but it can get sticky--I really
appreciate it when this kind of thing happens. Note that I dismissed
two of
Deer Tick's three most recent albums, though I liked the other one
a lot. Thanks, Ian--I'm glad you care, and glad you can tell I always
try to tell the truth as I hear it.
|
|