Robert Christgau: Dean of American Rock Critics

Consumer Guide:
  User's Guide
  Grades 1990-
  Grades 1969-89
Books
Writings:
  CG Columns
  Rock&Roll& [new]
  Rock&Roll& [old]
  Music Essays
  Music Reviews
  Book Reviews
  Playboy
  Blender
  Rolling Stone
  Video Reviews
  Pazz & Jop
  Recyclables
  Newsprint
  Lists
  Miscellany
Bibliography
NPR
NAJP Blog
Web Site:
  Home
  Site Map
  What's New?
Carola Dibbell
CG Search:
Google Search:

A New (Rock) Polarity

THE SEX REVOLTS
Gender, Rebellion and Rock 'n' Roll
By Simon Reynolds and Joy Press
Harvard University Press

Most histories of rock and roll are organized around one or several familiar polarities: art and commerce, rebel and establishment, young and old, black and white. The Sex Revolts doesn't claim to be definitive, but it often feels like a history of rock and roll organized solely around male and female. For Reynolds, a New York-based Briton, and Press, his American wife, rock plainly belongs to the avant-garde rather than the pop tradition. So it's not surprising that they have plenty to say about the human longing for infancy and nothing about the paradoxical involvement of full-grown adults in what was originally conceived as teen music. And despite a barely examined assumption that "for decades" this music was "based on . . . an emulation of black machismo, flamboyance, passion and self-aggrandizement," black artists are all but ignored--however brilliantly Aretha Franklin, Marvin Gaye, and Al Green, to name just three, configured gender, they're "soul," not "rock."

Nevertheless, both as an account of bohemian sexism and an exploration of how sexual identity inflects musical form, The Sex Revolts is thorough yet highly (if sometimes irritatingly) idiosyncratic. Unabashed fans of four-on-the-floor male chauvinists from Jim Morrison to Australian cult favorite Nick Cave, Reynolds and Press are also eloquent in their praise of a more womanly "oceanic" aesthetic they discern in figures as diverse as the German avant-gardists Can, punk poet Patti Smith, and Joni Mitchell's far-flung heiresses. Let's hope that theirs is not the last cross-disciplinary work that owes its ambitions to the cultural studies movement while refusing to succumb to academic provincialism and jargon.

New York Times Book Review, 1995