Xgau SezThese are questions submitted by readers, and answered by Robert Christgau. New ones will appear in batches every third Tuesday. To ask your own question, please use this form. April 19, 2203[Q] Hi Bob! I'd like to pick your brain as someone who was there. What was it like hearing Eric Clapton in the 1960s? I know plenty of lore about him, but struggle to detail his specific "contribution" to rock music (I ask this as a fan of his). I suspect he was an early conjuror of identiriffs but have never read that anywhere. I know about the lengthy solos with Cream, which you're not a fan of, but in your reviews I sense there is something else about his playing in general that both appealed to you and was well-regarded among your peers--that he was a known quantity for aficionados going into the seventies and Layla. I'd love to know more about your opinion of him at the time and the general, on the ground experience of his early career. A reflection back on that career from the vantage of 2023 would be a lovely bonus. -- Bradley Sroka, Sterling, Virginia [A]
As my Clapton piece in Grown Up All Wrong explains, I respect
Clapton's facility as a player but have warmed to him only
intermittently. Not a big Yardbirds fan though they were certainly OK,
not a big Cream fan ditto--Disraeli Gears is my favorite in
their rather tiny catalogue, and always there's Jack Bruce's
portentous proto-art-rock vocals to get past. The first Derek and the
Dominoes album I love and still play occasionally because it fills a
special need, and I also still go for 461 Ocean Boulevard. But
except for one story that's where it ends and that's all I'm
writing. The story is about seeing Derek and the Dominos in Pasadena
in November 1970. Great show--that truly was a terrific band. But what
I always recall is what my date had to say about it. She was a very
intelligent and openminded colleague of mine at Cal Arts and we had a
good time together even though she wasn't much into music. But this
concert she loved loved loved, and in the course of telling her about
the band I mentioned the silly way fans had of calling Clapton
God. Judy didn't think it was silly at all. "I can see why," she
said. So maybe there was something there I missed.
[Q] In the years since "Papa's Got a Brand New Bag," what other turning points in the history of popular music stick out to you the most? -- David, Fairfax, Virginia [A]
Aretha on Atlantic. The first Ramones album for sure. Multiple hip-hop
moments--Sugarhill Gang, Bambaataa, "That's the Joint," "The Message,"
Public Enemy too. Bikini Kill more than Sleater-Kinney, better though
S-K were. Maybe the Backstreet Boys, who got that ball rolling. As
much earlier did Sunny Ade, who I'd argue made Youssou
possible. Arguably electric Miles. And Bob Dylan oughtn't be left off
this list even though he slightly preceded "Brand New Bag." Indeed,
ditto for the Beatles. "Brand New Bag" is musically
fundamental. But culturally fundamental has to be in the mix.
March 15, 2023Laughter in review, Afrobeats eartime and Afropop explorations, an audio book recommendation, the artistic gas crisis, and infirmity keeps creeping. [Q] How do you rate standup comedy? Any favorite CDs/specials? -- Conor, Toronto [A]
I've always liked standup but don't listen to or watch much of
it--couldn't even get through the recent George Carlin doc though I
dug him back in the '70s. We did enjoy and admire the recent
documentary The Real Charlie Chaplin, which does justice to
Chaplin's physical genius and conceptual daring while also
establishing that superstar egomania long preceded Led Zeppelin. We
also devoured Richard Pryor's Live in Concert on Netflix, where
we both were struck by how physical as well as verbal-aural he was. I
gave Pryor's nine-CD 2000 Rhino box And It's Deep, Too! an
A plus. Answering you I pulled
out Volume 1 of Fantasy's Lenny Bruce Originals and it sounds
great though I don't think I ever reviewed it. And above all there's
the
Firesign Theater, a
late-'60s-rooted made-for-the-recording-studio LA comedy troupe whose
brilliant
Shoes for Industry best-of
is still at Amazon. Greil Marcus reported that he used them--and also
Monty Python--as background music
when he was writing Lipstick Traces. Perhaps overly trippy in
retrospect. But terrific.
[Q] What are your thoughts on the mainstreaming of modern Afrobeats/Afropop? Are popular African artists such as WizKid, Tems, Burna Boy, and Black Sheriff worthy artists? -- Darwin, Woodbridge, Virginia [A]
I've put in a lot of ear time on what I think of as "Afrobeats" and
its cousins, Burna Boy especially, with little to show for it. The
main exception seems to be in the general vicinity of South African
amapiano, which as I think about it
now for the umpteenth time is the one recent Afropop genre that's
beat-based rather than song-based. Which to bring it one step further
is the only new African subgenre if that's even the term that's
rhythm-based--whereas, to follow this line of thought, most of the
many postcolonial African genres that have given me so much pleasure
not to mention column inches over the years are rhythm-first albeit
often with deeply pleasurable singers like
Rochereau and
Sunny Ade attached. That's way
too simplistic with a profusion of exceptions--where does it leave the
likes of
Thomas Mapfumo,
Oumou Sangare, the titanic
Youssou N'Dour just for
starters? But conceptually it's a start. I eagerly await an
"Afrobeats" type who's a substantial as opposed to merely facile pop
songwriter.
[Q] Your writing continues to compel me to listen to music carefully, my thanks! Any interest in revisiting Graceland (the Paul Simon album, not the Elvis tomb)? -- Adam, Arlington, Massachusetts [A]
I've played it at least twice in the past two-three years and it
sounded fine--although not, of course, as musically revelatory as it
did in 1986, when my
Afropop explorations were still
just beginning, although they preceded
Graceland by several
years--there are four African albums on the
1982 Dean's List, for instance. The
Africa section of
Is It Still Good to Ya? includes a
long essay initially inspired by
Graceland, which is on my site although condensed and revised
for the book.
[Q] As a since childhood reader due to your triumph over almost every "Reviews" section of Wikipedia, I wonder if you would oppose others reading your longer articles out loud for educational purposes. I appreciate your well-worded takes because they seem so earnest as well as thoughtful, but even though you question the purpose of listening to reviews when you have less of a connection to someone like Fantano, for some of us it is faster than reading, perhaps due to ADD, too much TV, or the internet raising our nation's souls. Or is that all just another excuse to learn less? Either way, I certainly know more than a toddler because of both of youse boys. Not that I could make the recordings myself, I'm sure someone else already started, and I just hope they do your work justice. I appreciated Auriculum, but don't expect more. The books you have already made are phenomenal. I take my time with fiction but I look forward to Carola's book when I'm able. -- Justin Grignon, Guelph, Ontario [A]
Assuming anyone would actually do such a thing, I find it hard to
imagine why I'd object while reserving the right to change my mind
should said miracle, endeavor, or stab in the dark ensue. While we're
both waiting, pick up
The
Only Ones. Some literary wannabes found the prose Carola
invented there daunting, but for rock and rollers it reads like
butter, and if you insist there's also an
audiobook.
[Q] Bob, I refer to your website quite often when searching out used records to see if they are worth my time. Like you, I am a fan of "countrified music" like what the Byrds and the Buffalo Springfield released in the late '60s. Recently, I listened to the Springfield's Last Time Around, and the Byrds' Sweetheart of the Rodeo and remembered why I loved them so much. I then proceeded to put on the Southern-Hillman-Furay Band's first album, and wondered where the fallout happened. I will admit to enjoying the Eagles, Chris Hillman's Desert Rose, solo Stephen Stills, and some Poco, but in regards to what they followed, the music and lyrics can sometimes be vapid and overdone. Certainly, I think all these guys were/are very talented and have had more money than I will ever obtain, but their work seems to dip in quality over time. It seems to me that the only guy out of this group who remained relevant and did not need a super group or band to prop them up forever is Neil Young. -- Huey, Memphis [A]
Artists run out of gas, that's all. They have an idea or an angle or
just a bunch of stuff to say--musically, verbally, or both. They're
making a good living at it, enjoying the road although that seldom
lasts, bonding with their bandmates. Conflicts arise, but at the very
least they find themselves with a job they like. Only those artistic
and interpersonal materials generally get stale even if replacement
bandmates are easier to come by than replacement spouses. An
impressive exception is Neil Young, who despite his affable demeanor
there's little evidence is actually all that nice a guy, his
certifiable genius enhanced by endurance alone. In pop/rock/whatever
that's truly unusual. In jazz, where hard-earned technical skill
counts for more and lasts better, lifers are far more common, and
let's pause a moment to recall Wayne Shorter. But in pop, even when
commercial success endures, the aesthetic excitement often seems
staler and staler even for listeners who engage with the innovations
or if you like fads pop records have somehow been generating for over
a century.
[Q] Any chance you could live forever, please? -- Stu Hutch, Sydney, Australia [A]
I've found that turning 80 had the effect of putting questions like
this one--which Carola found touching and thanks you for--in the
forefront of my mind. It definitely sharpens one's interest in
mortality, as did, for that matter, Carola's
2017 cancer diagnosis, especially before we learned that while
multiple myeloma can be fatal, it seldom kills quickly and doesn't
necessarily kill at all. When we began that journey, each of us came
to realize separately that he or she wanted to die first. That was
clarifying and in a way gratifying. The problem with living let's not
say forever so how about till 100 is that infirmity keeps
creeping. What's passed off as "aches and pains" always hurts and
often cripples, and if you have Alzheimer's in your family, as I
do--my mom died of it at 89 and her father had some sort of dementia
when he died at 83 in 1971--there's that worry whenever you can't
remember who produced the Stones' Dirty Work, which at the moment I
can't though I remember he boomed too much for the purists. I could go
on, but I have work to do.
February 15, 2023Rock & roll's early days, the limits of the megastar pop life, Beyoncé and the road to an A plus, S − Y = ?, "Beth Ann and Macrobioticism," books that read like butter (and some that don't). [Q] I've only recently began to take a liking to early rock & roll, and while I am aware of and enjoy the music of the key players--Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, Little Richard, Jerry Lee Lewis, etc.--I still feel as though there is a vast territory left to explore. What are some of the best books to enlighten me on how rock n roll developed--both in general and in different states, for example New Orleans or Philly rock. Recommendations of other artists and their work who were key in bringing rock to life but for one reason or another aren't as renowned as the ones mentioned above would also be of great help to better develop my knowledge and appreciation of early (circa '50s--early-'60s) rock & roll. -- Juan, Paraguay [A]
The late Charlie Gillett's The Sound of the City was the
seminal text. A lecture I gave on it is in Book Reports. The first
volume of the late Ed Ward's The History of Rock & Roll is
almost as good in its own way and benefits from hindsight. The back
end of my first Consumer Guide book has
two discographies, the album one
way out of date but the singles one guaranteed dynamite. See also my
Barnes & Noble piece "Ain't That a Shame," collected in Book
Reports and
on my site too.
[Q] You said about Taylor Swift's Reputation that the issue is that she "completely identifies as a popstar." How is that a problem when she actually is a pop star, and, if I might say, our current biggest one? Do you think that writing songs about fame makes her art less relevant? -- Abdelhamid Kbabra, Paris [A]
Absolutely I do. In a singer-songwriter like Swift, I as a listener am
always most attracted to stories and turns of insight relevant to my
own emotional life, which even as someone fortunate enough to have
been happily married for half a century I nonetheless still reflect on
quite a bit as I think about the joys and travails of friends, family,
and humanity in general. Because I'm a popular music fan as well as
critic, the megastar pop life also interests me and has inspired
excellent music from the Beatles to Beyoncé. But although pure
musicality is always crucial and sometimes decisive, the megastars who
can reflect meaningfully or for that matter exuberantly or for that
matter humorously on more generally relevant matters--friendship,
pleasure, conflict, contradiction, loss, politics, social unrest,
stuff I'm not clever enough to isolate off the top of my head
here--are the ones who move me most and matter most to me. And
musicality or no musicality, the travails of fame are usually a bore
by me.
[Q] Among all the rightful praise thrown your way, Dean, I would like to add this vital point: you have been right. Critics, to be worth their salt, have to emerge from the pages of history as right, right? My personal experience has demonstrated this--freakin' Field Day, for prime instance. Universally dismissed (Rolling Stone gives it the back of the hand) and you give it an A plus. A plus! Today it sounds--God--so damn good, it holds up and I expect it to do so for years into the future. My question is this: I know you have spoken about this in the past but what records do you recall as being the absolutely toughest to settle on and decide? And why? -- Werner Trieschmann, Little Rock, Arkansas [A]
It really doesn't work that way for me except insofar as giving any
album an A plus is such risky business that I've done so less and less
over the years. I've been grading records for so long that the 80 or
so A records I find each year get there by kicking off a part of my
brain that starts saying to me "Oh yeah, that's an A." Sometime that
album will dip to B plus, other times it starts registering full
A. But A plus is someplace else altogether. The reason I gave
Beyoncé's Renaissance one
last summer is that it had begun its life for me getting
Bob-Carola-thanks-Nina through a traffic jam and remained our go-to
car music for a week of driving around the Connecticut shore. As
someone who stopped owning cars in 2006, that's not liable to happen
to me again anytime soon. Though maybe I should have given
that Selo i Ludi record one now
that I think on it--to me it seems that resonant historically. Only,
well, there were those two Rammstein covers.
[Q] Kim Gordon > Thurston Moore in Sonic Youth. Do you agree, Bob? -- Zeng, Jiangxi, China [A]
Kim is smarter if all too aware of it and her only solo rock record
was way better than any of Thurston's, plus she didn't break up the
marriage. But Thurston was the rock and roll heart of that great band,
which badly needed one though Steve Shelley played a similar role. So
by me they're equals--bandwise, anyway.
[Q] Is your 1966 piece about a woman who died as a result of a macrobiotic diet available somewhere online? If not, do you think you'd be willing to share it with us? -- Michael, Scranton, Pennsylvania [A]
It's on
my site. Made my career well
before Tom Wolfe included it in his The New Journalism
collection. Never wrote anything else quite like it--it's so sparely
Hemingwayesque, with an undeniable built-in ending.
[Q] The recent question about Bolaño elicits in me a keen desire to know more about the novels you've consumed. Ideally we'd get your top 10 for every calendar year--we know you are not averse to annual lists as such--but I'll happily settle for 20 good novels people may be less familiar with. -- Martin, Cleveland, Ohio [A] How about 11? Most longish, two quite brief, several I've written about including three in Going Into the City, one you've seen the movie of (which ain't bad), three by writers I've reviewed in the Voice, three by writers of color, a few particularly the all too unsung Drabble read like butter and a few don't come close.
January 18, 2023The limits of lists, the power of craft and wisdom over time, the vocal brilliance of Charley Pride, the educational playfulness of Sophie, '2666' remains on the shelf, & middle ground for socialism. [Q] Rolling Stone's top 500 albums underwent quite a shakeup from both previous versions in their update last year. The concept of "ranking" albums, especially across artist, decade, and genre, is too complex for me to seriously consider. I can argue why Aftermath is better than Let It Bleed but don't ask me to compare either of them to In a Silent Way. Still, as far as choices go, Rolling Stone's choice of What's Going On is an odd one. Even in its own offbeat, stoned universe, it is far from perfect (an A for me). Do you think these lists have any utility? Is there a way to create a list that you would prefer? -- Jacob H, Minneapolis [A]
It's nice to have a new reader, as I assume you are because I've
complained about the
overrated What's Going On
many times, although note that
the mag didn't "choose" it as number one, it ran a poll in which it
was voted number one. Moreover, I wrote a piece about the
Stone list for And It Don't Stop that ran in
September 2020, and filed
another about Stone's much later
singles list. As for the
greatest singers thing the mag recently put on the newsstands, which
several readers have inquired about, the truth is that I've yet to
read it bottom to top but would probably lead off any such list of my
own, which at the moment I have no interest in concocting, with
Frank Sinatra and Billie
Holiday, both high on the Stone list but not high enough.
[Q] Bill James has done studies that track the average performance of baseball players by age. I haven't seen studies like that of musicians and probably never will because we don't have statistics for them like we do for ballplayers. (We do have your grades, though!) Without getting too rigorous, it still seems to me that the average peak age for rock musicians is probably about what it is for athletes--around 27ish. I wonder if you agree, and if you'd expect those abilities to rise and fall together if you take a long view of them. I wonder who would be your picks for outlier rock musicians who did their best musical work after 30. Your marks suggest that you might regard Bruce Springsteen and Bob Dylan as examples. -- HB, NYC [A]
This seems wrong to me. For sure many bands and solo artists come off
the blocks young and never quite equal that pitch of intensity
again--many would say Dylan though I wouldn't, Ramones, Stooges,
Beatles too although Lennon's
Plastic Ono Band came when
he was 29 and I'm a big fan of
Double Fantasy 10 years
later. But 27 is way young for an "average peak age" even though
Joplin and Hendrix died at 27 and Kurt Cobain later joined what his
mother called "that stupid club" (and Otis Redding went down in a
plane crash at 26 and Buddy Holly at just 22, which renders neither
any kind of burnout). A minute or two of brainstorming reminded me of
Exile on Main Street and
Some Girls, post-30 Stones
masterpieces both. For my money
Sonic Youth and
Yo La Tengo were better past 30
than they were before. Neil Young did his best work in his thirties
and then kept going, and note too that even Chuck Berry's "Maybellene"
broke when he was just shy of 29 and a bunch of his greatest songs
were written in prison when he was pushing 40. General conclusion:
especially for individuals but often for whole bands, the pop music
labeled "rock" generally turns into a career, and while the excitement
may well wane, craft and wisdom often compensate.
[Q] Did Robert Christgau know Charley Pride? -- Robert Mazzella [A] If by "know" you mean personally please be advised that this is a silly question. I meet very few musicians, and though usually I like them when I do, the only one I know well is Peter Stampfel, a friendship that began well after his professional peak such as it was. True, in recent years I've developed warm acquaintanceships with a few artists whose careers I helped boost early, notably Adam Weiner of Low Cut Connie and the Wussy karass. But even so that's just not how my life works. That said, Pride was a worth mourning when he died two years ago, and musically I stand by the best-of review you'll find just below, although I'd amend it to say that racially Nashville has opened up a little in the two decades since I wrote it.
[Q] Hello, just wondered if you've thought about Sophie's all-too-small output in her brief time on earth since her passing. Personally, it was comforting to hear that her saddest song was permission to just cry, for whatever reason life provides. Ultimately, I saw her vision as one of an uplifting spirit that affirms both dancefloor euphoria and transhumanist folly. If a lot of queer art is just a bugle from the aftermath of a war, however well played, then Sophie could be the one that sounds most triumphant. Make of that last proclamation what you will, guess this is ultimately just another one of those "What do you make of this artist?" requests. With all due respect to your health and time, all my best to you and all you hold dear, and thank you for everything. -- Jen Friendship, Brisbane, Australia [A]
I liked both of Sophie's albums
quite a lot, their playfulness
especially, and was quite saddened to read of her accidental death two
years ago. That said, I can't claim to have put them on since--her
cultural frame of reference isn't mine, which makes her playfulness
educational and even enlightening but less personally compelling than
it might be. That said, I listened to both twice with pleasure upon
receipt of this question, although I continued to find the clotted
"Pretending" a waste of time.
[Q] I hope you read 2666. You deserve the pleasure. I wish you dug Tull but that's a whole other issue. Thanks for your work. Very appreciated by me. -- Bernie Kellman, San Francisco [A]
I read 40-50 books a year, but that requires discipline, and throw an
1100-pager into the mix and it becomes pretty much impossible. Longest
of 2022 was my continued-from-2021 third read of the 800-plus-page
The Brothers Karamazov, the first two when I was in my teens so
that like Crime and Punishment it played an enormous role in my
spiritual development that I thought it would be enlightening to
revisit, which it was. I also got through David Graebner's 500-plus
and rather less fast-moving Debt: The First 5,000 Years. In
2009 I read Bolano's 648-page The Savage Detectives and came
away impressed and enlightened, particularly as regards Mexico. But
2666 I left to my fiction-oriented novelist wife Carola, who's
imbibed a lot more Bolano than I have and recalls that after the long
and harrowing rape section toward the end, which she admired and
admires tremendously, she was too spiritually exhausted to continue
and never went back. So the pleasure you suggest if that's the right
word will probably remain beyond my ken. Although not as far beyond my
ken as Jethro Tull.
[Q] Capitalism or socialism? -- Anonymous, United States [A]
If those are my only choices, socialism of course. But as you seem
suspiciously unaware in your anonymous way, perhaps because you think
capitalism is the only right answer and want to provoke me, they're
not. I refer you to
"Dark Night of the Quants," a 2011
Barnes & Noble Review column conveniently collected in my
2018 Duke University Press Book Reports, where I report on 10
books about the 2008 financial crisis, one of them summed up thusly:
"Ha-Joon Chang, 23 Things They Don't Tell You About
Capitalism. South Korean-born British economist loves Swedish
capitalism and hates the free-market kind. Like most liberal
economists, not much use on political implementation of his sane
proposals. A−" Which is to respond, there is a middle ground, and
Chang explains it very well.
|
|